No.073 / 280Growth & bonds · Co-op & social play

You See, I Know

One player sees the problem, another holds the answer, and only talking joins them.

Prototype complexity
Who plays
Co-op play
Design focus
Information · Cooperation · Timing
Keep Talking and Nobody ExplodesNo.073Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes

01The core loop

Action → feedback → next choice
  1. 01Each sees half
  2. 02Describe it aloud
  3. 03Partner looks it up
  4. 04Act and verify

↻Feedback changes the situation — the next round starts from there.

Walk through one round

A simplified design example. Situations and numbers illustrate the mechanic, not exact rules from a reference game.

  1. T1

    Turn 1 · The situation

    One player sees four colored wires; the manual says ‘if two red, cut the last blue’, with 90 seconds left.

  2. T2

    Turn 2 · The player chooses

    The viewer reads colors in order, and the reader asks for a top-to-bottom recap.

  3. T3

    Turn 3 · The feedback

    A purple wire mistaken for blue is caught, and the right wire is cut.

  4. T4

    Turn 4 · The next decision

    They agree to always pair colors with position numbers.

How it plays

Players are split across locations or screens: one faces the puzzle, the other holds the manual or other clues. They can’t see each other’s view and must describe precisely. Timers and error buzzes add pressure; solving is the payoff.

What the player weighs

  • Speak fast vs speak precisely
  • One leads vs both confirm

02Start small

Quest · 0/3Prototype complexityCompact prototypeWho plays · Co-op play

Scope is an editorial estimate for the minimum prototype, not the reference game or a production schedule.

03One mechanic, different implementations

Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes
K

Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes

P1

One player sees the bomb without the manual while others read the manual without seeing the bomb, defusing it by talking under a timer.

We Were Here
W

We Were Here

P2

Two players are separated in a castle and talk only through in-game walkie-talkies, one describing what they see while the other guides from clues.

The difference worth noticing

Keep Talking is one-to-many manual lookup; We Were Here is a symmetric two-player puzzle across separate spaces.

Case notes are Yoroll editorial summaries; rules may change between versions.

04What could you combine?

Fusion · Original design proposal · not an existing feature
You See, I KnowCo-op & social play+

Write the manual in an invented script that both players decode from context over several levels, speeding up their communication.

Prototype this combo in Yoroll

→Follow the next idea

Co-op & social play

Debate and Vote

Lay out the evidence and talk the table into the right vote.

Prototype complexity
Who plays
Competitive play
  1. 01A meeting is called
  2. 02Share what you saw
  3. 03Question each other
  4. 04Vote someone out
Among Us · Goose Goose Duck
Co-op & social play

Pick Them Back Up

A fallen teammate isn’t the end; risking the rescue is the real team test.

Prototype complexity
Who plays
Co-op play
  1. 01A teammate goes down
  2. 02Weigh the rescue risk
  3. 03Reach them and hold to revive
  4. 04Back in action or wipe
Deep Rock Galactic · Sea of Thieves
Co-op & social play

Hidden Roles

You know who you are; your job is making everyone believe otherwise.

Prototype complexity
Who plays
Competitive play
  1. 01Roles dealt secretly
  2. 02Act on your role
  3. 03Disguise or observe
  4. 04Exposed or victorious
Among Us · Goose Goose Duck
yorollGAMEPLAY ATLAS

Good mechanics deserve a closer look. Good ideas deserve a next step.

Entries are written by Yoroll editors. Game names and trademarks belong to their respective owners.